The Campaign for Constitutionalism and Human Rights (CCHR) has criticised the Lagos State Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Lawal Pedro, over claims that the Abuja Court of Appeal judgment on Vehicle Inspection Office (VIO) activities is not binding on Lagos State.
The group described the claim as legally flawed.
In a statement by Olutola Folorunsho, Publicity Secretary of CCHR, and Toyin Raheem, Executive Secretary, the organisation said the Court of Appeal ruling applies nationwide. It added that Pedro’s position reflects poorly on his office and could mislead young lawyers.
The statement read: “A judgment of a Federal High Court is binding nationwide, especially when affirmed by a higher court such as the Court of Appeal.
“The judgment did not exempt any state. Pedro ought to have appealed to the Supreme Court or sought clarification instead of issuing confusing statements. VIO/VIS operations on Lagos roads — including vehicle inspections, roadside harassment and extortion — are illegal.
“Proper inspections should be conducted at certified centres, not chaotic roadblocks that prioritise revenue over citizens.
“The activities of VIO/VIS in Lagos and Ogun States, and indeed across Nigeria, are unlawful and amount to contempt of court.”
CCHR, therefore, demanded the immediate withdrawal of VIO officials from Lagos roads and a public apology from Pedro to residents of the State for the confusion caused.
The group threatened to mobilise affected citizens for lawsuit if its demands are not met.
It added that Nigeria is a democracy governed by the rule of law, and governments must not choose which judgments to obey, as court rulings remain valid until overturned by a higher court.